Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Aris Nakos's avatar

The hundred small ones framing is the part most population level testosterone coverage flattens entirely.

People hear the 20 percent generational drop and picture a single villain.

A hundred small inflows is a different argument and lands closer to how the EDC literature actually reads.

The Tongkat and Fadogia personal bloodwork is the cleanest version of run the test before you trust the marketing I've seen anyone publish.

Most men in the optimisation space never run the before and after themselves, and the supplement category survives on people who didn't.

The 280 to clinical 300 floor reframe is the part that should land hardest in the diagnosis section.

Most men assume below the floor means dramatic deficiency.

Just enough below to explain everything you were feeling is the much more common pattern, and almost nobody walks into a GP appointment expecting that number to matter.

For the lifestyle list you ranked, where would you put the personal care and household chemical inflow audit alongside weight, sleep, lifting, stress, alcohol, vitamin D?

The HERMOSA biomarker data sits inside the same reversibility window as the items you ranked, but the male side rarely gets a parallel checklist.

p.s. side project of mine, mangood.app, basically a scanner for hormone disrupting ingredients in everyday products tuned for men.

Sits next to the inflow audit that doesn't quite make the lifestyle list yet.

Still beta. Would value your eyes if you ever have a sec.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?